Like every Scottish schoolboy mine was a dream of footballing glory, not a dream of customised Bentleys inlaid with my shirt number, not a dream of pneumatic chested blonde skanks with a penchant for kiss and tell tabloid tales and not a dream of late night celebrity endorsed premier appearances with my haircut of the week. My dream like the love of my team was pure, it was to put on the Hoops and play for my boyhood heroes, but as with all childhood fantasies it was trampled by the marching inevitability of reality.Like the majority of fans, I live the highs and lows of the Rolex wearing, Ferrari driving football star by proxy as a fan. Nothing compares with the sheer sense of pride felt standing with your fellow fans cheering for the greater cause of your team. The fact we invest so much time and money in my team gives us a deserved sense of ownership of our team and makes us take great stock in any current affairs even if they are involved in the layman’s minefield of club financial dealings.
It’s with this in mind that I’ve been thinking of the chasm that exists between the EPL and SPL. This omnipresent gap is a constant source of amusement for my southern brothers but never before has it been so wide. Celtic are one of the most illustrious clubs in football history. The first non-Latin club to lift the European Cup, we are one of the top 5 supported teams on the face of the planet, yet this year Portsmouth, a team who only recently lifted the FA cup (their second major Wembley final since 1939) have spent considerably more than us in the existing transfer window. No disrespect to them but it seems that teams outside the “Big 4” are having to spend a disproportionately huge amount of cash to justify their existence in EPL. Portsmouth recently paid in excess of £10 million for Peter Crouch, certainly not a world class player, what this does is push up the prices of “average” talents to astronomical levels. The sad reality of trading in this vastly inflated market is that the only target the likes of Portsmouth can really aspire to is a UEFA cup run, and the prize money, even if they were to win such a tournament would fall far below the amount they are spending just to qualify.
Another fantastic example of this is the newly completed transfer of David Bentley to Spurs for a £17m fee. Bent has struggled to maintain his place in the English national side and, although a fantastic young English prospect is hardly setting the world of football alite. This year Spurs were knocked out of the UEFA cup by Eindhoven in their bid to reach the Quarter Finals. Although it pains me compare this to Rangers, a team who made it to the final of the same competition, and a team who so far have spent under £5m total in the current window.
Celtic, a team who have twice in the last two years reached the knock-out stages of the Champions League are consistently finding themselves outbid by lower yield English clubs. As a result of this greater reliance is being put on the Scottish youth structure and as a by-product we are now seeing a proliferation of young Scottish talent, creating a national side once again capable of competing in world football. Of course this is a pleasant side effect of self sufficiency, but in club football you cannot have sole reliance on youth academies without having significant funds to bolster your squad with experienced European talent. Barcelona are a fantastic example of the perfection of this scheme.
Now the greater the chokehold the “Big 4” have on the Champions League, this gap can only widen leaving the remaining clubs in the EPL no opportunity to reply not with results but financially. This monopoly is ruining the potential of the world greatest league. But what to do when transfer fees and player’s wages affect every aspect of the game right down to the corporate advertisement on the front of a fan’s season ticket. A possible solution, and one that would site mass agreement among fans, would be a cap put on both player fees and wages. How can a team justify the payment of £30m transfer fee, and £120’000 a week for playing a game. It’s a disgrace with such poverty evident in today’s world that such money can be thrown at something so ultimately superficial as competitive sport.
If such a cap was ever introduced it could only have a positive effect on the game, as it would prove who is loyal to the club, and not the pound. A perfect example of this would be if today’s “superstar slave” Christiano Ronaldo was at the top end of the wage cap (which he no doubt would be) and going to Real Madrid meant he would earn the same amount, would he show the same 'desire' to join them? In turn English clubs would need more emphasis on youth development as it wouldn’t be as easy to plunder clubs for their prized assets, and in time smaller clubs would be able to compete and develop at a higher level also.
Of course like most salaries in society the amount paid in relation to work is based up on yield efficiency. A sportsman such as Ronaldo can entertain a huge audience meaning huge productivity (especially with today’s TV coverage). A talent such as Ronaldo’s is so rare that of course he should be rewarded for satisfying a market demand of millions. But his is gift and subsequent greed really worth his touted fee of £70m? Compare that to Glasgow Rangers total market worth at approximately £95m.
In practice wage capping is ultimately very difficult to control as a player’s salary can be subsidised with bonuses and would become incentivised. Although there are ways around this with a no tolerance approach based on the US NHL blueprint it could work in reality. Of course though, with a wage cap this would make the EPL seem far less attractive to foreign players and be disastrous to the EPL’s distinction of World’s greatest football league.
Whatever the case English Football has reached critical mass and the sooner this self indulgent bubble bursts the quicker we can reclaim our beautiful game.










